<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Most Popular Spam Analysis</title>
<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>20 Jul 2008 03:58:05 +0400</lastBuildDate>

	<item>
		<author>Denis Nazarov, Olga Emelyanova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>On June 7th, 2006, breaking news appeared on Analyst's Diary, the Kaspersky Lab weblog: "New Gpcode with a 660 bit key...cracked by Kaspersky Lab!&quot; </description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=189678219</link>
		<pubDate>26 Jun 2006 13:23:00 +0400</pubDate>
		<title>Blackmailer: the story of Gpcode</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>David Emm</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The nature of threats encounted by PC users has changed significantly over the years. Today's threats are more complex than ever before. So is it still worth using a traditional antivirus solution? Read on to find out. </description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=153595662</link>
		<pubDate>17 Oct 2004 19:46:00 +0400</pubDate>
		<title>Traditional antivirus solutions - are they effective against today's threats?</title>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>