<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1251" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Latest Spam Analysis</title>
<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>18 Mar 2010 04:55:53 +0300</lastBuildDate>

	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam detected in mail traffic averaged 86.1% in January 2010. A low of 78.9% was recorded on 8 January, with a peak of 89.5% on 24 January.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792105</link>
		<pubDate>26 Feb 2010 16:31:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: January 2010</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Elena Bondarenko, Darya Gudkova, Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The percentage of spam in mail traffic in 2009 came to an average of 85.2%, or 3.1% higher than in 2008. The highest percentage of spam recorded was 93% on 22 February, while the low for the year was 72.8% on 26 April.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792103</link>
		<pubDate>17 Feb 2010 12:30:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Kaspersky Security Bulletin: Spam Evolution 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam in email traffic decreased by 2.2% compared to November&amp;#8217;s figure. The overall average being 82.6% for December</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792100</link>
		<pubDate>14 Jan 2010 11:45:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: December 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam in email traffic decreased by 0.9% compared to October&amp;#8217;s figure. The overall average being 84.8% for November. </description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792096</link>
		<pubDate>22 Dec 2009 12:37:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: November 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Vitaly Kamluk</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>With the appearance of botnets, criminal gangs have gained access to millions of infected computers and the number of cybercrimes committed has risen sharply. Although the majority of Internet users understand that zombie networks pose a serious threat, many do not know how or why botnets are created and maintained.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792095</link>
		<pubDate>17 Dec 2009 13:45:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>The botnet ecosystem</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam detected in email traffic averaged 85.7% in October 2009</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792093</link>
		<pubDate>10 Dec 2009 15:43:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: October 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Darya Gudkova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>In the third quarter of 2009, the percentage of spam in mail traffic averaged 85.7%</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792091</link>
		<pubDate>23 Nov 2009 15:53:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: July-September 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam detected in email traffic averaged 86.3% in September 2009. A low of 83.3% was recorded on 18 September with a peak value of 91.3% being reached on 27 September.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792088</link>
		<pubDate>09 Nov 2009 16:19:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: September 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Sergey Golovanov, Igor Soumenkov</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>This article is a study of one spam email and illustrates the methods employed by today&amp;#8217;s cyber criminals to create botnets and conduct mass spam mailings</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792083</link>
		<pubDate>09 Oct 2009 11:54:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>The Cash Factory</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>Spam in mail traffic
Malicious attachments and links
Phishing
Sources of spam on the Russian Internet
Spam by category
Original spam
Spammer methods and tricks
Conclusion

Spam in mail traffic
The amount of spam detected in mail traffic averaged 85.1% in August 2009.  A low of 76.3% was...</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792086</link>
		<pubDate>02 Oct 2009 13:14:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: August 2009 </title>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>