<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1251" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Latest Spam Analysis</title>
<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>07 Nov 2009 19:31:56 +0300</lastBuildDate>

	<item>
		<author>Sergey Golovanov, Igor Soumenkov</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>This article is a study of one spam email and illustrates the methods employed by today&amp;#8217;s cyber criminals to create botnets and conduct mass spam mailings</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792083</link>
		<pubDate>09 Oct 2009 11:54:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>The Cash Factory</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Maria Namestnikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>Spam in mail traffic
Malicious attachments and links
Phishing
Sources of spam on the Russian Internet
Spam by category
Original spam
Spammer methods and tricks
Conclusion

Spam in mail traffic
The amount of spam detected in mail traffic averaged 85.1% in August 2009.  A low of 76.3% was...</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792086</link>
		<pubDate>02 Oct 2009 13:14:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: August 2009 </title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Elena Bondarenko, Darya Gudkova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>Spam averaged 85.5% of mail traffic over the first half of 2009. The lowest figure was 72.8% on April 26th, while the highest percentage was 93%, recorded on February 22nd. 0.3% of spam messages included malicious attachments.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792072</link>
		<pubDate>25 Aug 2009 16:59:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: January &amp;ndash; June 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Tatyana Kulikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam in mail traffic averaged 85.7% in July. A low of 80.9% was recorded on 17 July, while there was a high of 90.8% on 19 July.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792074</link>
		<pubDate>11 Aug 2009 10:12:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: July 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Tatyana Kulikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam in mail traffic averaged 84% in June. A low of 78.3% was recorded on 12 June, while there was a high of 88.9% on 28 June.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792069</link>
		<pubDate>23 Jul 2009 15:37:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: June 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Tatyana Kulikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam in mail traffic averaged 82.7% in April. A low of 72.8% was recorded on 26 April, while there was a high of 88.2% on 20 April</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792065</link>
		<pubDate>11 Jun 2009 12:50:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: April 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Darya Gudkova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>During Q1 2009, spam accounted for 86.8% of all mail traffic which is 5% higher than the average amount of spam in 2008. However, this is not an indicator of an increase in spam in mail traffic.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792061</link>
		<pubDate>14 May 2009 10:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: January - March 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Tatyana Kulikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The amount of spam in mail traffic averaged 87.2%. A low of 81.4% was recorded on 20 February, while there was a high of 93% on 22 February.</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792058</link>
		<pubDate>12 Mar 2009 12:44:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam evolution: February 2009</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author></author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The year 2008 was special for a number of reasons. On the one hand, the first serious steps were taken to combat spam on an international level. </description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792053</link>
		<pubDate>02 Mar 2009 16:30:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Kaspersky Security Bulletin: Spam Evolution 2008</title>
	</item>
	<item>
		<author>Tatyana Kulikova</author>
		<category>Spam</category>
		<description>The closure of US hosting provider McColo, which hosted the command and control centers of a number of large botnets, resulted in a sharp decline in the amount of spam in November</description>
		<link>http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=204792048</link>
		<pubDate>11 Jan 2009 14:14:00 +0300</pubDate>
		<title>Spam Evolution: November 2008 </title>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>